Research Topic and RQs

Research Topic and RQs

- Lệ Thu HUF04 Nguyễn Thị の投稿

Research Topic: Technology-Assisted Pronunciation Training: Improving Vowel Production of Secondary School Students Using the Speechace API

 Research Questions:

RQ1: ...

詳細...

Research Topic: Technology-Assisted Pronunciation Training: Improving Vowel Production of Secondary School Students Using the Speechace API

 Research Questions:

RQ1: What vowel pronunciation difficulties do secondary school students face before using the Speechace API?
RQ2: Is there a significant difference between students’ pronunciation performance before and after using the Speechace API?
RQ3: How do students perceive the use of the Speechace API in learning pronunciation? 
RQ4: What challenges and benefits arise when integrating the Speechace API into speaking lessons?

 Research Objectives:

- To identify common vowel pronunciation errors made by secondary school students before using the Speechace API. 
- To examine the improvement in students’ vowel pronunciation after using the Speechace API. 
- To investigate students’ attitudes and perceptions toward using the Speechace API in learning pronunciation.

 Planned Methodology

 This study adopts a mixed-methods approach: 
- Quantitative data are collected through pre-test and post-test scores to measure students’ improvement. 
- Qualitative data are obtained from questionnaires to explore students’ perceptions of using the Speechace API.

Research Topic and RQs

- Trần Đông Bảo CHÂU HUF04 の投稿
Hi chị Thu,

Great topic! Using Speechace API for pronunciation is really practical and timely, esp when AI is the all the craze right now. I like that you're focusing ...

詳細...

Hi chị Thu,

Great topic! Using Speechace API for pronunciation is really practical and timely, esp when AI is the all the craze right now. I like that you're focusing specifically on vowels rather than all pronunciation, making it manageable. But still, is it too broad? Are you targeting all the vowels or just the ones that are problematic for Vietnamese learners (e.g., /ɪ/ vs. /i:/, /æ/ vs. /e/).
 
There are some suggestions I have for the methodologicals details, like:
- The details for the research should be mentioned. How long will students use Speechace? What grade level? How many students? These details will make your study clearer and more replicable.
- You should also consider a control group. Right now it's just pre-post comparison. If possible, having a control group (students doing traditional pronunciation practice) would strengthen your findings about whether Speechace actually works better.
- One small thing I think you should clarify is "qualitative obtained from questionnaires" part. Questionnaires are usually quantitative (Likert scales). Did you mean interviews for qualitative data, or open-ended questions on the survey?

Overall, your topic is feasible and valuable, especially for Vietnamese traditional EFL contexts where pronunciation receives little attention. With some refinement of methodology details, this could be a strong, publishable study. Looking forward to seeing your results.