The questionnaire and dataset were obtained from a survey titled “User Perceptions of AI Tools in Linguistics Studies,” conducted by Mr. Vũ on the Tari website.
Descript...
The questionnaire and dataset were obtained from a survey titled “User Perceptions of AI Tools in Linguistics Studies,” conducted by Mr. Vũ on the Tari website.
Descriptive statistics table: here
-
What is the most surprising finding?
-
A notable finding is that all mean scores cluster around 4.00 on a five-point scale, indicating consistently positive perceptions of AI tool usability.
-
The highest rating relates to user-friendly design (M = 4.01), suggesting strong agreement that the interface supports learning.
-
The slightly lower score for finding features easily (M = 3.80) is interesting because it hints at minor usability challenges despite overall positive perceptions.
-
-
What do the central tendency values (mean/median/mode) tell you?
-
The mean values indicate that participants generally agree that AI tools are easy to use, efficient, and clearly designed.
-
The closeness of scores across items suggests stable attitudes rather than extreme opinions.
-
These central tendency patterns reflect a shared perception of usability within the sample.
-
-
Are there any issues with outliers or skewness?
-
Standard deviations remain below 1.00, indicating moderate variability and relatively consistent responses.
-
Although some minimum scores fall toward the lower end of the scale, they do not substantially distort the overall averages.
-
Therefore, there is no strong evidence of problematic outliers or skewness affecting interpretation.
-