Peer Review of t-test Results

Your report shows a basic understanding of how to present an independent samples t-test, but there are some important issues that need correction. The most critical problem is the interpretation of significance: you stated that the results were “statistically significant,” but the p-value is 0.371, which is greater than .05, so the result is actually not significant. This contradicts your conclusion.
In addition, the effect size (d = 0.05) is extremely small, which also supports the idea that there is no meaningful difference between the two groups. The t-value (t = -2.74) seems inconsistent with the high p-value, so it would be good to double-check your SPSS output for possible errors.

You did a great job on this report. It’s well-organized and shows you really know your way around statistical analysis. I’m impressed that you correctly identified when to use the 'equal variances assumed' row after checking Levene’s test. Your presentation of the t-test and effect sizes is spot-on, and the APA summary is both clear and effective.