In English-medium classrooms, communication extends far beyond the spoken word. While verbal clarity is essential, a substantial part of meaning is transmitted through nonverbal cues such as posture, gesture, gaze, facial expressions, and tone. For EMI lecturers, whose students may be navigating unfamiliar linguistic terrain, nonverbal communication becomes a strategic tool for reinforcing comprehension, guiding attention, and shaping classroom climate. Similarly, the thoughtful use of visual aids enhances multimodal input, helping students process complex academic content through both linguistic and non-linguistic channels.
The Role of Nonverbal Communication in EMI
Nonverbal communication refers to the expressive behaviors that accompany or replace speech. In EMI contexts, students may not always comprehend full verbal explanations, particularly when dealing with discipline-specific terminology or rapid pacing. Effective use of gestures, facial expressions, and body positioning can bridge gaps in understanding and provide visual cues that support meaning-making. For instance, sustained eye contact can signal inclusion and instructional pacing, while strategic pauses and hand movements can highlight key concepts or transitions, offering students additional processing time.
In many high-context cultures across Asia, students rely more heavily on subtle interpersonal cues than in Western classroom environments. An encouraging nod, an open posture, or a gentle pace of movement can communicate approachability and create a psychologically safe environment for participation. Conversely, abrupt gestures, minimal facial expression, or avoidance of eye contact may unintentionally convey impatience or distance, affecting students’ willingness to contribute.
Research underscores the centrality of nonverbal communication in English-Medium Instruction, emphasizing that nonverbal behaviors significantly influence engagement, comprehension, and rapport building in multilingual settings (Matthews, 2023; Naeem & Razaq, 2024). Intentional use of gestures and facial cues has been shown to support language processing and stimulate student interest, improving learning outcomes (Naz Naz, 2023). Furthermore, establishing shared interests and demonstrating interpersonal warmth through nonverbal expression contributes to a positive, relational classroom climate, which enhances students’ willingness to participate (Hyun-Joo, 2024).
Types of Nonverbal Techniques Useful in EMI Teaching
- Gestures: Highlight terminology, indicate relationships, or model sequences.
- Facial Expressions: Signal encouragement, empathy, and emotional tone.
- Eye Contact: Maintain student engagement and monitor comprehension.
- Movement and Proximity: Manage classroom interaction and group focus.
- Paralinguistic Cues: Tone, pace, and volume to emphasize structure.
Integrating Visual Aids to Support Comprehension
Visual aids such as slides, diagrams, charts, and videos play an indispensable role in EMI contexts by reducing cognitive load and providing multimodal pathways to understanding. Instead of relying on dense text-based presentation slides, lecturers can use carefully selected images, simplified diagrams, and structured layout cues to clarify key concepts. This aligns with principles of dual-coding theory, which suggests that learners process information more effectively when it is presented both visually and verbally.
Guidelines for Effective Visual Aid Design
- Use minimal text and emphasize keywords.
- Choose clear, high-quality visuals that directly support the concept.
- Use consistent color and font schemes to avoid visual overload.
- Introduce diagrams slowly, explaining components step-by-step.
- Encourage students to take structured notes linked to the visuals.
Bringing It Together in Classroom Practice
The synergy between nonverbal communication and visual aids allows EMI lecturers to create accessible, engaging learning experiences. When gestures point to visual references, students can follow meaning even if they miss individual words. When tone and pause accompany a highlighted diagram, learners receive cues about what to focus on. Ultimately, the lecturer’s awareness of how they look, move, and design visual environments contributes to student confidence, motivation, and academic comprehension.
References
Hyun-Joo, A. (2024). Group rapport building in an institutionaized face-to-face interaction: A case study. International Journal of Arts Humanities & Social Science, 5(10), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.56734/ijahss.v5n10a4
Matthews, G. (2023). The teaching of nonverbal communication to EFL learners: In Taiwan. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 11(4), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.37745/ijelt.13/vol11n416
Naeem, N., & Razaq, M. (2024). Linguistic accommodation in English-medium instruction: Investigating adjustments by non-native English speakers. Global Social Sciences Review, 9(4), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2024(ix-iv).11
Naz, E. (2023). Use of nonverbal communication while teaching primary school students. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2023(4-iii)62