Research Methodology

Exploring
Meanings & Contexts

Qualitative research relies on methods that allow researchers to explore the depth of human experience. We focus on four core data collection pillars.

Interviews

Focus Groups

Observation

Analysis

Interviews

"A one-to-one conversation aimed at exploring perspectives in depth."

Types of Interviews

Structured

Same questions asked in the same order.

Semi-structured

Guided by questions but flexible for follow-ups.

Unstructured

Conversational, open-ended, participant-led.

Strengths

Rich detail, flexibility, ability to probe deeper.

Limitations

Time-consuming, potential interviewer bias.

Real World Example

Interviewing postgraduate students about challenges in thesis writing.

Focus Groups

"Group discussion with 6–10 participants guided by a facilitator."

Key Features

  • Participants interact with each other, not just the facilitator.
  • Encourages multiple viewpoints and shared meanings.
  • Useful for exploring consensus and diversity of opinion.

Strengths

Interactive, efficient for gathering broad perspectives.

Limitations

Dominant voices may overshadow others; confidentiality is hard to ensure.

Example

A focus group with teachers to discuss integrating digital tools in classrooms.

Observation

"Systematic watching, listening, and recording of behavior in natural settings."

Participant Observation

Researcher actively engages in the setting.

Non-Participant

Researcher observes without direct involvement.

Overt vs. Covert

Participants know (or do not know) they are being observed.

Pros

Direct, real-world data; captures non-verbal behavior.

Cons

Researcher presence may influence behavior; ethical concerns.

Example: Observing classroom interactions between teachers and students.

Document Analysis

Reviewing and interpreting existing documents to uncover meanings.

Public

Policies, reports, media.

Personal

Letters, diaries.

Institutional

Minutes, curricula.

Cost-effective Unobtrusive Access Issues Lack Context

Methodological Comparison

Method Focus Strengths Limitations
Interviews Individual perspectives Depth, flexibility Time-consuming, bias
Focus Groups Group interaction Multiple views, efficient Dominant voices, confidentiality
Observation Behavior in natural context Authenticity, non-verbal data Observer effect, ethical issues
Document Analysis Written/archival sources Unobtrusive, historical data Authenticity, limited context

Reflection Activity

Think about your research topic:

  • Which data collection method would you choose, and why?
  • Would combining two or more methods strengthen your study (triangulation)?