Research Context
Imagine a study investigating the drivers of student happiness at a university. We want to know which factors best predict satisfaction and how much variance we can explain.
Variables
- Dependent (Y): Student Satisfaction Score
- Independent (X): Teaching Support, Workload, Motivation
Key Results Dashboard
Model Fit (R²)
Adjusted R² = 0.50
Explains about half the variance in satisfaction.
ANOVA Significance
The model is statistically significant overall.
Diagnostics Check
-
Independence (D-W)
1.92
-
Multicollinearity (VIF)
< 2.0
-
Residuals
Normal
Coefficients (Impact Strength)
Interpretation
Teaching support is the strongest predictor of satisfaction. Interestingly, while motivation helps, a heavier workload actively decreases satisfaction scores.
APA Write-Up Example
A multiple regression examined predictors of student satisfaction. The model was significant, F(3, 120) = 43.6, p < .001, explaining 50% of the variance in satisfaction (Adjusted R² = .50). Teaching support (B = .30, p < .001) and motivation (B = .22, p < .01) were positive predictors, while workload (B = –.18, p < .05) negatively predicted satisfaction.
Quick Check-in
1. Which factor was the strongest positive predictor?
Why is Adjusted R² useful?
Click to reveal answer
It penalizes the model for adding useless variables, giving a more realistic estimate of how well the model generalizes to the population.
Discuss: The Negative Workload Effect
"How would you explain the negative coefficient for workload to a non-specialist?"