Your interpretation is clear and easy to follow, and you correctly identified that the assumptions of normality, linearity, and homoscedasticity are met. The use of VIF and...
Your interpretation is clear and easy to follow, and you correctly identified that the assumptions of normality, linearity, and homoscedasticity are met. The use of VIF and tolerance to address multicollinearity is also accurate.
One suggestion is to slightly refine your wording—R² = .466 is better described as a moderate rather than “large” proportion of variance. You could also briefly mention the direction and significance of the predictors to make your interpretation more complete.
Overall, your explanation is solid, but adding a bit more precision and detail would strengthen it further.
One suggestion is to slightly refine your wording—R² = .466 is better described as a moderate rather than “large” proportion of variance. You could also briefly mention the direction and significance of the predictors to make your interpretation more complete.
Overall, your explanation is solid, but adding a bit more precision and detail would strengthen it further.